Issue there is the EDID devices mostly flaked out when using converters so could never get reliable results. (Except where I was able to use an EDID device to treat HDMI as DVI but I can't remember every possible variation. IMO, for the Nvidia 900 series on XP a monitor that doesn't support higher refresh rates that XP (video driver) cannot support is preferred since you end up having to use refreshlock anyway (which isn't that big of a deal) but really a dedicated monitor that is within the HBR1 limit that XP supports is ideal.Īll my tests were in situations where the Nvidia driver treats an HDMI as HDMI and not HDMI as DVI. It's possible HDMI may suit your purposes for your newer machine though but if you need gsync\freesync or high refresh rates it may not. Every time I'd get it working perfect then randomly out of the blue there would be issues and it always came down to the switch being the issue. You could use a two or three port displayport switch but everytime I've used them I've had nothing but issues. For audio you'll have to use a sound card. So the Nvidia drivers have the ability to switch HDMI to DVI mode for those monitors that would otherwise report as a TV likely due to the extra extensions like the ability for the monitor to support audio, so it's a good thing that HDMI reports as DVI otherwise the monitor would show up as a TV.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |